In England, the Transfer of
Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, commonly called TUPE,
protect employee rights during company transfers. This regulation typically
applies when a business is transferred from one employer to another, rather
than in cases of outsourcing where employees are reassigned to a new employer
while maintaining their current positions. For TUPE to be relevant, the
transaction must lead to the transfer of an 'economic entity'.
The core principle of these
regulations is to ensure that employees do not face any adverse effects on
their employment status solely due to a change in their employer. To uphold
this principle, TUPE provides that existing employment contracts remain intact,
encompassing provisions regarding employee liability, collective agreements,
and dismissals.
This means that when a
transfer takes place, the new employer must assume all aspects of the
employment package, including the benefits and liabilities associated with the
workforce. Conversely, the original employer retains responsibility for
fulfilling employment obligations and any existing legal liabilities,
particularly those related to claims for wrongful dismissal and associated
damages.
Protection of Employment
Under TUPE
TUPE was established to
protect the employment rights of individuals whose contracts are automatically
transferred from one employer to another during a business transfer. The
underlying principle is that employees, along with their employment terms, are
often a company's most valuable asset. When a transfer occurs under TUPE, the
employee's original contract remains intact, ensuring their employment with the
new employer continues under the same terms and conditions. The only change is
that the employee now works for the new employer rather than the previous one.
For a transfer to be valid
under TUPE, the entire business or part of it must retain its identity. This
"identity" is assessed by examining significant factors contributing
to the business's recognisability. For instance, the company should operate
from the same premises, or there should be a notable retention of employees at
that location following the transfer. TUPE stipulates that employees
automatically transfer to a new employer when their employing entity undergoes
a business transfer.
The term
"transfer" in the context of TUPE has a dual interpretation. It can
refer specifically to the transition from one employer to another, but it also
encompasses the entire process of modifying the terms of the employee's
contract. The primary aim of TUPE is to ensure that employees' rights are
preserved when their employer undergoes a business transfer or sale.
Consequently, this protection ensures that employees continue working under the
same terms and conditions as before the transfer, meaning their employment
contracts remain unchanged.
Transfer of Employee
Contracts
The pertinent regulations
concerning the transfer of contracts are found in regulations 4 and 5 of the
Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, which
specifically address the implications of employment transfer. Regulation 4 establishes
an obligation to transfer employees. In an employment contract, the parties are
the employer and the employee. Since the employees being transferred were
previously employed by the outgoing employer, referred to here as the
"transferor," the initial point of contact is with this transferor.
The term
"employer" is defined as the individual or entity that employs the
employee immediately before the transfer, meaning that the outgoing employer
must hold this status at the time of the transfer. Regulation 4(1) further
stipulates that, unless stated otherwise in these regulations, the contract
between the transferor and the employee remains valid during the transfer, with
the transferee assuming the employer's role.
This indicates that the
contract associated with the employee is passed on to the new owner. It is
essential to note the distinction made in this regulation between the employer,
who is responsible for continuing wage payments and has authority over wage
management, and the contract itself. While the same obligations to the employee
persist, the identity of the party responsible for fulfilling these obligations
has shifted.
Several sections within the
regulations clarify that any contract transfer involving a change of employer
remains intact, imposing a duty on the new owner to fulfil wage payments and
uphold the rights associated with the employer's role. The new owner is
obligated to adhere to the contract but is only accountable to the extent of
the powers and responsibilities outlined in the relevant legislation.
Compliance with the contract's terms is mandatory, and the new owner must
adhere to these stipulations.
The Impact of Collective
Agreements
In specific situations, the
responsibilities of employers subject to existing collective agreements aimed
at safeguarding employees may be transferred to new employers when an
undertaking is transferred. This transfer of obligations can occur either through
the stipulations outlined in the collective agreement or because of the Trade
Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act. Additionally, employees who
serve as organisers or representatives of trade unions typically receive
further protection following such a transfer.
The transition of an
undertaking does not alter the employer's responsibilities, which are
considered inherited liabilities, nor does it affect the provision of enhanced
benefits under a pay scheme where the identification badge is present. However,
a temporary shared ownership transfer may influence this protection. The
collective agreements currently in place to protect employees during the
transfer of an undertaking are of significant concern to trade unions,
employers, and employees alike.
The applicable legislation
outlines a process that enables trade unions and employers to quickly negotiate
agreements, ensuring that standard terms do not apply to employee contracts
during a business transfer. Without proper intervention or regulation, inappropriate
ceremonial methods may be used, allowing managers to absolve themselves of
responsibility if they cannot modify an existing collective agreement.
In specific scenarios where
a large segment of the workforce faces unemployment, the Secretary of State can
intervene and prevent standard terms from being applied. This provision aims to
safeguard employees' rights and ensure their interests are protected during
transitions in ownership or management of businesses.
The Obligations of Employers
Towards Employees
Both the Transferor and the
Transferee are responsible for their obligations towards employees during the
transfer of an undertaking as outlined by the Employment Regulations. Both
parties must actively engage with employees and their representatives throughout
this process. Affected employees may choose to be represented by a recognised
trade union or, if none is available, by any elected representatives of their
preference. The Transferor must promptly inform and consult with each affected
employee or their representative regarding the transfer details.
Likewise, the Transferee is
required to provide similar information to the affected employees and their
representatives. Failing to meet these responsibilities can lead to civil
liability for both parties. The information shared must encompass the nature of
the transfer, the rationale behind it, and the economic, legal, and social
consequences for the employees involved. This obligation is strictly to provide
information for the Transferor, while the Transferee is tasked with informing
and consulting.
The mandated consultation
process is substantial, although it does not reach the level of what could be
described as "meaningful consultation," as the Transferee is only
obliged to consider any feedback received before finalising the transfer. The
Transferor's obligations to inform and consult do not apply if the employees
are being transferred to a Transferee that is not regarded as a successor
employer. This situation is particularly relevant if the Transferee does not
intend to retain the affected employees following the transfer. In such
instances, the Transferee must consult to agree on whether any affected
employees will transition into new employment.
The Employer's Duty to
Inform and Consult
Employers are responsible
for engaging with their employees regarding various aspects of their business
operations. This responsibility is known as the "duty to inform and
consult." This obligation also applies in TUPE transfers; however, it
pertains solely to the consultation process rather than the obligation to
inform. A transferor will not be considered violating this duty if it fails to
notify an appropriate employee representative about a TUPE transfer, provided
that the transferor was unaware of the necessary information to share with
them.
The limitations of the TUPE
provisions are significant, as they depend on broader statutory requirements.
These regulations require employers to consult on specific issues and ensure employee
representatives receive the relevant information. While the duty to consult is
recognised, the scope of the informing aspect is restricted, which can lead to
confusion regarding the transferor's responsibilities.
While employers are required
to consult with employees about various business matters, the obligations
surrounding TUPE transfers are narrowly defined. The transferor's duty is
primarily focused on consultation, and they cannot be held accountable for failing
to inform if they lack knowledge of the relevant details. This highlights the
need for a clear understanding of the statutory framework governing these
obligations to ensure compliance and effective communication within the
workplace.
TUPE Transfer Liabilities
and Responsibilities
In the context of TUPE
legislation, often referred to as the regulations, a transfer is recognised
when there is a shift of an economic entity that maintains its identity. Any
situation that meets this criterion will trigger a TUPE transfer. There are four
key components associated with a transfer:
- The transferor.
- The transferee.
- The employees impacted by the
transfer.
- Any changes in service provision.
TUPE mandates that the new
employer accept the existing employees along with their current terms and
conditions.
Before the transfer takes
effect, the employer needs to consult regarding it. Failure to do so can lead
to penalties ranging from £500 to £10,000 for each employee. This means new
organisations emerge while existing ones must relinquish their responsibilities
and liabilities concerning their employees to the new entity. Employees retain
the right to pursue legal action against their former and new employers for
issues that arose before the transfer if the previous employers are still
operational and have not issued termination notices.
Avoiding such liabilities
can be challenging, especially if an employee cannot recover from one of the
employers. However, the employer can seek reimbursement for any amounts paid by
taking corrective measures against the other employer involved. Adhering to the
regulations or securing comprehensive indemnities to prevent any liabilities
arising after the transfer is crucial. This ensures that all parties are
protected and that the transition of responsibilities is managed effectively,
minimising potential disputes and financial repercussions.
The Impact on Employees
The effects of TUPE on
employees can be profound. Employees are automatically moved to the new
employer when a business undergoes a transfer, typically maintaining their
existing employment terms and conditions until any changes are made. This rule
also applies to transferring statutory recognition agreements currently in
place for trade unions. Despite employees being grouped under the same terms,
the changes associated with the business transition can often create friction
and issues among different employee groups.
Since they share the same
employment conditions, any modifications usually require mutual agreement or a
formal consultation process regarding alterations to those terms. The new
employer assumes significant responsibilities concerning the employees from the
previous employer. There are three primary considerations in this context. If
an employee is made redundant following a TUPE transfer and the redundancy is
linked to the transfer, they may be entitled to a redundancy payment. The
employee must have completed two years of continuous service with either the
old or new employer to qualify for this payment, provided the transfer occurs
within that period.
Employees with less than two
years of continuous service are ineligible for redundancy payments; however,
they may pursue claims for unfair dismissal if they can demonstrate that their
dismissal was unjustified. It is important to note that any ongoing claims
against the previous employer will be transferred along with the business.
However, the new employer will not be held liable for claims related to the
transfer, as any redundancy or dismissal must be connected to the transfer
itself for liability to arise. This delineation of responsibility is crucial
for employers and employees navigating the complexities of TUPE regulations.
The Impact of TUPE and Job
Security
Since TUPE was introduced,
job security has emerged as a critical concern. Employers, especially those
contemplating a transfer and employees who may be affected, recognise that if
an employment contract is enforceable, there may be limited opportunities for
financial negotiations with prospective new employers. The Act maintains the
protections established by the previous Acquired Rights Directive, ensuring
that the rights and obligations associated with an employment contract,
including any active collective agreements, are transferred along with the
business.
However, the TUPE
Regulations enhance these protections, particularly concerning redundancy and
dismissal. It is important to note that TUPE applies exclusively to employees
and does not extend to self-employed individuals, as outlined in the Acquired
Rights Directive. Job transfers are permissible only when a business transfer
aims to generate profit. Transfers cannot occur if the service is purely public
or involves substantial public funding without a profit motive. Nevertheless,
incorporated entities providing such services, privatised utility companies and
others that previously held monopoly rights are included under these
regulations.
The primary objective of
TUPE is to restore employee confidence following a transfer of employment. The
legislation aims to prevent individuals from being transferred to positions
with diminished benefits or reduced job security compared to what they would
have had if the transfer had not occurred. The fundamental principle of these
regulations is that transferred employees retain all the rights and protections
they would have enjoyed had the transfer not occurred.
Proposed Changes to
Employment Terms During TUPE
The TUPE Regulations
typically permit employers to unilaterally modify employee contract terms after
a transfer. However, changes cannot occur if they are primarily motivated by
the transfer without valid economic, technical, or organisational reasons. For
example, if a pension scheme guarantees a minimum contribution of 5% and is
subsequently downgraded after transfer, it is to encourage switching to a new
scheme. In that case, this constitutes a unilateral change in entitlements. The
employer might claim economic justification for the reduction, allowing them to
bypass the original terms.
Regarding dismissals, if an
employee is terminated due to the transfer, it is classified as an
automatically unfair dismissal. Nevertheless, employers retain the right to
dismiss employees for legitimate reasons such as retirement, redundancy, or an
employee's ongoing refusal to accept a reasonable change to their contract.
While various factors might render the dismissal of an employee for not
receiving a contract change unreasonable at the time of the transfer, it is
essential to note that an employer cannot pre-emptively dismiss an employee
simply for expressing their refusal before the transfer occurs.
While TUPE provides certain
protections, it does not entirely shield employees from changes to their
employment terms after the transfer, provided a valid justification exists.
Employers must carefully navigate these regulations, ensuring that legitimate
economic reasons support any changes made and that dismissals are conducted in
accordance with the law. Employers must exercise caution when overseeing
employees' refusals to accept contract changes, as pre-emptive actions can lead
to legal complications.
Additional articles can be found at Business Law Made Easy. This site looks at business legislation to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their product and service supply to the customers' delight. ©️ Business Law Made Easy. All rights reserved.
