The Transfer of Undertakings
(Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, commonly called TUPE, provide
safeguards for employees when their employer changes. This legislation grants
specific rights to employees whose business is being transferred to new
ownership, ensuring that they retain their current terms and conditions of
employment. The previous and incoming employers are legally required to inform
and consult with the affected employees.
These regulations are
designed to prevent any disadvantage to existing employees due to the transfer,
and companies seeking to acquire new business must be aware of their
responsibilities under TUPE. TUPE applies when an undertaking, business, or
part of a company is transferred to a different employer. It ensures employees
transition to their new employer while maintaining the same terms and
conditions.
Additionally, TUPE
facilitates the automatic transfer of employee rights and liabilities and the
protection of existing collective agreements. However, it is essential to note
that TUPE does not apply in every situation; a transfer must involve a sale,
transfer, or other disposition of a business or undertaking. The entire
business need not be transferred; for example, a change in the cleaning service
could result in the transfer of just the cleaning segment of a company.
There must also be a
transfer of a core business process that retains a distinct economic identity.
Merely changing suppliers does not activate the TUPE regulations. Nonetheless,
in some cases, a company contemplating a supplier change should examine the
historical context of the situation to ensure compliance with TUPE.
The Requirement for
Legislation
The TUPE Regulations are
designed to protect the rights of employees during business transfers,
outsourcing, or when services are transferred between providers. The primary
objective of these regulations is to uphold the existing terms and conditions
of employment without adverse changes and to encourage meaningful discussions
throughout the transfer process.
TUPE ensures that employees
experience continuity in their service when the ownership of a business
changes, mandating that all relevant contracts of employment and staff remain
intact unless valid economic, technical, or organisational reasons justify any
alterations. Employers engaged in a transfer must consider several critical
questions:
- Who are the employees entitled to
these protections?
- Who are the relevant businesses?
- What is the duration of their
service?
- How are responsibilities allocated?
- To whom are the employees assigned?
It is essential to note that
neither statutory nor collective agreements can alter the terms of an
individual employee's contract unless there is a substantial change. The
transferor is tasked with identifying which contracts must be transferred and
accepted as of the transfer date. This process involves a comprehensive
transfer of all employment contracts, including terms, conditions, service
lengths, and potential liabilities, from the transferor to the transferee.
Consequently, the transferor and transferee are responsible for ensuring
compliance with TUPE regulations.
The Objectives of TUPE
The primary goals of TUPE
can be categorised into two main areas, with the first focusing on protecting
employee rights. Employees may face significant changes that could adversely
affect their employment conditions when a business undergoes a transfer. To
address this, the Regulations are designed to safeguard these individuals'
rights and employment status. In the event of a transfer, employees from the
Transferor business typically retain certain rights that are automatically
passed on to the Transferee.
One of the most significant
rights transferred under TUPE is continuing the employee's employment contract
with the new employer. This provision ensures that while the obligations of the
original contracting entity are transferred to another party, the employee
remains bound by the contract. Consequently, the Transferee assumes the role of
the new employer for the employees of the Transferor business while being
required to adhere to the terms of the original contract, provided those terms
offer more favourable conditions than the minimum standards set by statutory
law.
Additionally, any
unqualified rights employees possess under the transferred contract, such as
rights to pay, bonuses, and pension entitlements, remain enforceable. TUPE
Regulations are applicable only in instances of a relevant transfer of
employment. This transfer is defined as the movement of an economic entity
capable of conducting its operations while retaining its identity.
Consequently, the new owner assumes control of a corporate entity that is not
merely a subsidiary of a larger organisation but functions as an independent
operation that can continue its activities.
Services provided by public
implementing bodies or the transfer of national public service obligations
within the EU are not exempt from the directive. Public service operations have
always been governed by the general labour laws, social security regulations,
civil protection measures, and foreign employee laws of the respective country
where these services are performed. When corporate branches are transferred
from one country to another, it can alter the employees' relationship with
their employer.
However, this transitional
phase does not exempt the company from upholding existing employee contracts. Transferring
a business unit does not constitute a valid objection to the regulations. The
rationale behind these regulations is rooted in the fact that such transfers
occur within a community market. Since the establishment of the European Court
of Justice (ECJ) in 1971 and its developments in 1986, the EU has progressively
refined its case law, initially limiting it to partial transfers and later
expanding it to encompass transfers of service contracts between different
service providers.
The EU directive explicitly
addresses the protection afforded to workers who experience a transfer of
employment due to business changes. Member states have adapted their laws to
ensure maximum security for employees affected by such transfers. This ongoing
legislative evolution reflects the EU's commitment to safeguarding workers'
rights in the context of corporate transitions.
The Transfer of Undertakings
The primary objective of
TUPE is to ensure that the new owner assumes responsibility for the existing
employment contracts. TUPE encompasses two main types of transfers: a statutory
transfer of an entire business or a portion of it, which may occur through
methods such as sale, merger, or asset transfer, and a service provision
change, which happens when a service contract is awarded or re-awarded or when
there is a shift in contractors. Additionally, TUPE extends protection to
certain employees in cases where the original employer is insolvent.
Employees impacted by a TUPE
transfer retain their existing rights through an automatic transfer that
becomes effective on the date of the transfer. Before this date, employers must
inform and consult with the relevant representatives of all employees affected
by the transfer. Non-compliance with this requirement may result in employees
having the right to file a claim with an Employment Tribunal. The previous and
new employers are responsible for any breaches of these obligations. Employees
also have the right to voice their grievances and seek redress for any adverse
treatment they may experience due to the transfer.
Since the implementation of
TUPE, the term "Provisions in favour of employee protection" has come
to signify a baseline level of employee protection that employers cannot
circumvent, although it can be enhanced. When a TUPE transfer occurs,
employees' contracts are automatically transferred to the new employer,
maintaining the same rights and obligations, albeit under the new management.
However, the new employer is restricted from altering any contract terms solely
due to the transfer unless such changes are justified by economic, technical,
or organisational reasons that necessitate adjustments in the workforce.
The Definition of an
Employee
The term
"employee" is defined in the 2006 Regulations regarding section 230
of the Employment Rights Act. This definition raises several considerations
regarding the individuals eligible for protection under the 2006 Regulations.
Primarily, a contract of employment must exist as specified by the Act. The
definition clarifies that an "employee" is someone who has entered a
contract of service or apprenticeship, and it also includes individuals
classified as employees by the statute, even if they are regarded as
self-employed.
Notably, exceptions exist
for quasi-employees, such as company directors, who may hold an employment
contract with their company but do not receive the protections afforded by
employment legislation. This definition has historically played a crucial role
in determining the scope of anti-discrimination laws, particularly in defining
an employer within that context. The significance of individuals who do not
fall under the employee category is diminished under the 2006 Regulations, as
they will not be transferred under a transfer unless they are engaged as
workers under a worker contract.
However, the emergence of
'gig economy' businesses, which provide various services to the public, has
sparked growing interest in the legal coverage applicable to this sector.
Currently, there is ambiguity regarding which categories of self-employed individuals,
if any, can be classified as workers. This leads to ongoing litigation,
particularly involving gig economy drivers who offer services to the public.
The Definition of a
Contractor
The contractor plays a
minimal role in the transfer process. However, several factors may be relevant
to them. One significant aspect is that employees often cannot choose their
employer during a transfer, particularly in the context of an established business.
Consequently, workers typically do not have the option to refuse the transfer
without risking unemployment. This situation may create a stable status quo
regarding the existing employees, which contractors should consider when
determining their pricing for the outsourcing opportunity.
The acquired business will
depend on key personnel, whom the contractor cannot freely select. While a
contractor may engage in discussions with the transferor regarding plans, the
transferor must tread carefully to avoid making any promises or commitments to
the transferred employees, as these individuals have vested interests in the
process.
This scenario is just one
aspect of the complex legal framework surrounding business transfers.
Additionally, concerns exist regarding the separation of individuals from the
group, which could lead to potential breaches of contractual rules by the
contractor. In this context, the contractor holds secondary liability, while
the transferor bears primary liability, which presents a legal problem.
The Business Implications of
TUPE
TUPE Regulations establish a
fundamental principle aimed at safeguarding the rights of employees from the
outgoing contractor. This regulation prevents the new contractor from altering
the terms of their employment contracts and ensures that their accrued rights
are maintained. The necessity for this provision arises from the need to
confirm a close relationship between the outgoing and incoming parties, as it
is essential to establish that the new contractor is indeed a successor rather
than an unrelated entity. Consequently, the TUPE Regulations are applicable
only under specific conditions, particularly when a distinct undertaking is
being transferred.
According to the TUPE
Regulations, the new employer must be "the person into whose hands the
undertaking is transferred." It is crucial that the undertaking retains
its identity for the transfer to qualify for the associated rights and
obligations. These criteria are straightforward to satisfy when the transferor
and transferee are contractors delivering the same service to a typical client.
However, a 'service provision change' is explicitly restricted in certain
situations, such as during a service reorganisation for "economic,
technical or organisational reasons."
The European Court of
Justice may soon scrutinise the implications of these regulations, as the
outcomes could significantly influence the interpretation of what constitutes a
service provision change under TUPE. In Ireland, the direct applicability of European
Regulations through the European Communities Act has facilitated the enactment
of necessary provisions, allowing service provision changes to be incorporated
into Irish legislation that implements the original TUPE framework for many
years.
The Array of Businesses
Covered by TUPE
The TUPE Regulations came
into effect when a business, or part of it, was transferred from one entity to
another. These regulations are designed to protect the rights of employees
whose jobs are affected by such transfers, ensuring that their employment terms
remain intact as they move to a new employer. Special provisions exist for
public sector employees and those in the services sector, mainly when the
transfer involves service provision. However, these regulations do not cover
certain transfers, such as those resulting from mergers or the transfer of an
insolvent business under formal rescue procedures.
Under TUPE, employees retain
their existing contracts when their employer changes, meaning that the new
employer assumes all rights and responsibilities previously held by the
employees. This includes any ongoing disputes and obligations related to pensions,
redundancy, and other employment matters. The essence of TUPE is to ensure the
continuity of employment rights during these transitions, thereby providing a
layer of protection for employees amidst organisational changes.
The origins of TUPE can be
traced back to the Acquired Rights Directive, established in the early 1980s to
mitigate the risk of mass dismissals during business transfers. The Directive
outlines three key scenarios for protection:
- A transfer of an economic entity
that maintains its identity.
- The transfer of individuals
providing services for financial activities.
- Transfers aimed at altering agreed
conditions.
In response to these
guidelines, the UK Government enacted the initial transfer of undertakings
legislation in December 1980, which has since undergone several amendments to
adapt to an evolving employment landscape.
Organisations must
understand the implications of TUPE Regulations when an employee transitions
from one employer to another. Given that this area of law significantly impacts
employment rights, TUPE can often be complex. The TUPE Regulations safeguard
employees during employer transitions in two primary ways. Firstly, they ensure
that employees retain their existing roles along with the same terms and
conditions when an employer changes.
Secondly, they impose
responsibilities on both outgoing and incoming employers to adhere to
established procedures. When these protections were introduced in the UK,
concerns arose among businesses that they might deter contract transfers.
Consequently, TUPE was revised to exclude specific contracts related to local
authority services in quality, security, surveillance, cleaning, and property
management.
The first exemption pertains
to the continuity of rights typically associated with any TUPE transfer,
allowing employees to become eligible for the new employer's pension scheme.
The new employer may have limited authority to modify the terms of this scheme.
However, they are obligated to cover any pension deficits that existed during
the transfer. The second exemption is relevant to any TUPE transfers within the
preceding 12 months.
Additional articles can be found at Business Law Made Easy. This site looks at business legislation to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their product and service supply to the customers' delight. ©️ Business Law Made Easy. All rights reserved.
